2018 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 700-800 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 500-600 |
Total Number of Projects: | 500-600 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
2017 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 400-500 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
Total Number of Projects: | 500-600 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 |
2016 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 400-500 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
Total Number of Projects: | 400-500 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 400-500 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 500-600 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 700-800 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 76 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 40 |
Partner Constancy: | 67 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 63 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
Total Number of Projects: | 63 |
Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
Partner Constancy: | 53 |
Project Leadership Index: | 60 |
Diversity Index: | 10 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
Total Number of Projects: | 56 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 99 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 99 |
Partner Constancy: | 26 |
Project Leadership Index: | 56 |
Diversity Index: | 12 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 74 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 78 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 78 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
Diversity Index: | 83 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 300-400 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 65 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 95 |
Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 300-400 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
Total number of projects: 98
As coordinator: 14
As participant: 84
Sole participant: 0
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.17*
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2017 | 0 | 29.183.738 | 1.853.274 | 5 | ||
2016 | 2.999.438 | 26.248.004 | 2.400.910 | 1 | 7 | |
2015 | 0 | 90.809.224 | 3.769.051 | 11 | ||
2014 | 14.996.962 | 42.275.878 | 6.360.139 | 2 | 6 | |
2013 | 2.946.537 | 37.783.128 | 3.203.213 | 1 | 12 | |
2012 | 8.996.877 | 68.964.678 | 3.408.299 | 3 | 12 | |
2011 | 11.009.287 | 59.815.644 | 5.048.109 | 5 | 13 | |
2010 | 3.995.418 | 57.117.410 | 3.830.383 | 2 | 18 |
Total number of partners: 1991
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 1054
Rare Partner: 937
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 1.12