
| 2016 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 600-700 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 | 
| 2015 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 | 
| 2014 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 400-500 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 99 | 
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 | 
| 2013 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 200-300 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 51 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 52 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 85 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 49 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 34 | 
| Diversity Index: | 57 | 
| 2012 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 88 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 47 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 64 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 35 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 34 | 
| Diversity Index: | 35 | 
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 63 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 | 
| Diversity Index: | 700-800 | 
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 93 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 | 
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 | 
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 300-400 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 400-500 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 | 
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 | 
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 300-400 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 94 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 71 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 75 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 | 
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 | 
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: | 
| Overall Score: | 200-300 | 
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 | 
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 | 
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 | 
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 | 
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 | 
| Project Leadership Index: | 69 | 
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 | 
									Total number of projects: 50
As coordinator: 9
As participant: 36
Sole participant: 5
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.25*
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2015 | 0 | 3.988.366 | 510.749 | 1 | ||
| 2014 | 6.416.548 | 19.998.649 | 4.894.240 | 3 | 4 | |
| 2013 | 14.282.850 | 169.680.467 | 17.124.826 | 6 | 18 | |
| 2012 | 20.439.059 | 70.674.819 | 7.451.087 | 5 | 11 | |
| 2010 | 0 | 6.640.000 | 972.784 | 2 | ||
							Total number of partners: 577
							Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 139
Rare Partner: 438
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.32