2018 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
2017 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
2016 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 75 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 400-500 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 91 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 47 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 700-800 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 64 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 56 |
Project Leadership Index: | 37 |
Diversity Index: | 11 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 55 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 44 |
Project Leadership Index: | 57 |
Diversity Index: | 5 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 400-500 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 600-700 |
Diversity Index: | 69 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 400-500 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 79 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 700-800 |
Project Leadership Index: | 700-800 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 300-400 |
Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 |
Partner Constancy: | 800-900 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 500-600 |
Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 600-700 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 69 |
Total number of projects: 108
As coordinator: 11
As participant: 85
Sole participant: 12
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.13*
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2018 | 479.722 | 0 | 479.722 | 2 | ||
2017 | 4.049.210 | 39.803.075 | 8.733.911 | 2 | 13 | |
2016 | 6.077.234 | 214.613.950 | 4.065.984 | 4 | 9 | |
2015 | 4.346.731 | 48.819.816 | 6.868.597 | 7 | 10 | |
2014 | 100.000 | 35.109.053 | 14.557.752 | 1 | 9 | |
2013 | 3.740.545 | 70.069.400 | 5.472.929 | 2 | 8 | |
2012 | 8.760.570 | 54.897.558 | 5.673.109 | 2 | 14 | |
2011 | 3.106.671 | 52.858.680 | 3.032.897 | 2 | 11 | |
2010 | 245.866 | 38.073.720 | 6.407.529 | 1 | 11 |
Total number of partners: 1378
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 524
Rare Partner: 854
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.61