
| 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | > 1000 |
| Total Number of Projects: | > 1000 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 400-500 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 92 |
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 500-600 |
| Total Project Funding: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 300-400 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 |
| Partner Constancy: | 900-1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 900-1000 |
| Diversity Index: | 300-400 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 80 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 97 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 64 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 51 |
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 900-1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
| Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Total funding / No of participants
Total number of projects: 165
As coordinator: 23
As participant: 140
Sole participant: 2
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.16*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2000 | 1.365.000 | 4.848.837 | 1.052.819 | 1 | 4 | |
| 2001 | 960.000 | 3.580.053 | 772.656 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2002 | 2.998.877 | 15.991.378 | 2.174.028 | 2 | 7 | |
| 2003 | 0 | 5.440.000 | 95.439 | 1 | ||
| 2004 | 10.300.000 | 48.518.944 | 2.092.940 | 2 | 9 | |
| 2005 | 0 | 4.121.035 | 378.150 | 3 | ||
| 2006 | 14.700.000 | 98.696.802 | 7.417.197 | 3 | 22 | |
| 2007 | 0 | 10.454.878 | 509.945 | 3 | ||
| 2008 | 21.500.442 | 70.725.986 | 8.211.617 | 7 | 24 | |
| 2009 | 0 | 23.614.061 | 2.171.038 | 8 | ||
| 2010 | 2.387.142 | 75.272.241 | 6.995.149 | 2 | 19 | |
| 2011 | 3.760.980 | 46.205.794 | 2.642.259 | 2 | 11 | |
| 2012 | 13.005.125 | 86.318.040 | 5.688.622 | 3 | 16 | |
| 2013 | 2.730.809 | 33.057.857 | 5.733.159 | 2 | 10 | |
Total number of partners:2283
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 932
Rare Partner: 1351
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.69
| Category: | No: |
|---|---|
| INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 92 |
| RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 59 |
| SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 17 |
| ENERGY | 15 |
| AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 10 |
| BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 9 |
| PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 5 |