2018 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 500-600 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 900-1000 |
Total Number of Projects: | 400-500 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 500-600 |
2017 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 88 |
Total Number of Projects: | 93 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
2016 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 65 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 51 |
Total Number of Projects: | 59 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 87 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 16 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 300-400 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 47 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 51 |
Project Leadership Index: | 42 |
Diversity Index: | 15 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 74 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 98 |
Total Number of Projects: | 49 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 41 |
Project Leadership Index: | 45 |
Diversity Index: | 7 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 59 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 51 |
Total Number of Projects: | 55 |
Total Project Funding: | 77 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 80 |
Partner Constancy: | 98 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 80 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
Project Leadership Index: | 72 |
Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 93 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 91 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 93 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 93 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 89 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 89 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 61 |
Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 51 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
Total number of projects: 172
As coordinator: 21
As participant: 124
Sole participant: 27
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.17*
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2018 | 173.076 | 0 | 173.076 | 1 | ||
2017 | 0 | 5.702.750 | 5.032.250 | 4 | ||
2016 | 2.715.863 | 183.342.500 | 5.196.429 | 5 | 5 | |
2015 | 30.712.612 | 74.131.207 | 17.086.772 | 16 | 13 | |
2014 | 547.502 | 22.137.566 | 7.261.984 | 2 | 7 | |
2013 | 15.743.972 | 202.992.934 | 9.878.622 | 6 | 26 | |
2012 | 5.551.782 | 73.389.119 | 9.431.363 | 5 | 17 | |
2011 | 22.997.062 | 108.050.476 | 20.424.060 | 7 | 33 | |
2010 | 30.254.814 | 96.448.347 | 14.371.562 | 6 | 19 |
Total number of partners: 2184
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 1047
Rare Partner: 1137
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.92