
| 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 57 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 46 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 60 |
| Diversity Index: | 24 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 95 |
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
| Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 400-500 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 500-600 |
| Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 95 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 94 |
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
| Diversity Index: | 4 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 72 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 82 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 56 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 52 |
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Total funding / No of participants
Total number of projects: 272
As coordinator: 36
As participant: 230
Sole participant: 6
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.16*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2000 | 8.452.588 | 39.404.223 | 6.131.451 | 9 | 28 | |
| 2001 | 1.100.150 | 31.834.052 | 3.597.012 | 2 | 25 | |
| 2002 | 2.849.503 | 44.633.908 | 3.461.653 | 2 | 23 | |
| 2003 | 1.829.073 | 38.528.235 | 1.661.011 | 3 | 8 | |
| 2004 | 14.923.481 | 128.093.611 | 7.353.323 | 6 | 26 | |
| 2005 | 6.099.998 | 39.930.959 | 3.466.537 | 2 | 17 | |
| 2006 | 3.677.840 | 49.645.051 | 3.740.376 | 4 | 20 | |
| 2007 | 993.286 | 23.339.152 | 2.093.369 | 2 | 11 | |
| 2008 | 11.375.099 | 36.704.622 | 2.695.813 | 4 | 10 | |
| 2009 | 4.005.242 | 57.908.025 | 4.053.897 | 2 | 15 | |
| 2010 | 0 | 59.156.533 | 4.851.886 | 15 | ||
| 2011 | 6.172.130 | 81.483.950 | 7.394.605 | 4 | 16 | |
| 2012 | 1.938.606 | 51.171.091 | 5.641.087 | 2 | 12 | |
| 2013 | 0 | 14.046.830 | 1.382.601 | 4 | ||
Total number of partners:3730
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 1556
Rare Partner: 2174
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.72
| Category: | No: |
|---|---|
| RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 125 |
| INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 117 |
| SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 90 |
| ENERGY | 77 |
| PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 26 |
| BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 16 |
| AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 15 |
| MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 14 |