
| 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 52 |
| Total Project Funding: | 96 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 45 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 40 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 37 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 24 |
| Diversity Index: | 10 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 70 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 88 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 300-400 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 600-700 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 89 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 72 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 83 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 400-500 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 69 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 95 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 77 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
| Diversity Index: | 63 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding: | 72 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 55 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 29 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 47 |
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 500-600 |
| Diversity Index: | 300-400 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Total funding / No of participants
Total number of projects: 220
As coordinator: 14
As participant: 153
Sole participant: 53
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.09*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2001 | 0 | 10.308.379 | 588.062 | 4 | ||
| 2002 | 834.445 | 5.688.543 | 1.343.545 | 1 | 6 | |
| 2004 | 7.839.525 | 100.424.050 | 4.845.149 | 3 | 14 | |
| 2005 | 2.124.762 | 179.268.413 | 13.829.224 | 4 | 14 | |
| 2006 | 2.907.621 | 56.063.983 | 5.558.071 | 4 | 18 | |
| 2007 | 1.647.016 | 43.484.455 | 3.568.238 | 6 | 13 | |
| 2008 | 10.342.863 | 55.113.947 | 7.591.616 | 7 | 19 | |
| 2009 | 7.897.667 | 51.992.372 | 7.408.205 | 4 | 10 | |
| 2010 | 8.256.085 | 62.199.230 | 10.834.963 | 7 | 16 | |
| 2011 | 9.408.243 | 44.137.969 | 12.983.007 | 10 | 17 | |
| 2012 | 21.221.621 | 65.404.381 | 18.832.158 | 14 | 17 | |
| 2013 | 8.852.012 | 13.853.321 | 6.868.927 | 7 | 4 | |
Total number of partners:2336
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 1124
Rare Partner: 1212
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.93
| Category: | No: |
|---|---|
| RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 94 |
| INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 65 |
| BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 36 |
| SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 21 |
| AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 17 |
| ENERGY | 13 |
| PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 13 |
| MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 3 |