2016 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 92 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 61 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 57 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 1 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 74 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 34 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | 50 |
Project Leadership Index: | 30 |
Diversity Index: | 9 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 64 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 39 |
Total Project Funding: | 94 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 54 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 54 |
Partner Constancy: | 38 |
Project Leadership Index: | 39 |
Diversity Index: | 13 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 53 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 85 |
Total Number of Projects: | 57 |
Total Project Funding: | 83 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 51 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 45 |
Diversity Index: | 44 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 78 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 72 |
Total Project Funding: | 55 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 46 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 64 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 69 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 45 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 90 |
Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 74 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 30 |
Diversity Index: | 700-800 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 100-200 |
Total Project Funding: | 200-300 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
Total number of projects: 108
As coordinator: 26
As participant: 80
Sole participant: 2
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.33*
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2016 | 1.035.250 | 0 | 229.375 | 1 | ||
2015 | 19.705.485 | 75.473.346 | 10.934.820 | 5 | 17 | |
2014 | 3.391.384 | 23.042.536 | 2.521.453 | 2 | 9 | |
2013 | 4.870.061 | 41.970.350 | 3.781.977 | 6 | 20 | |
2012 | 4.711.051 | 23.688.972 | 3.433.187 | 4 | 7 | |
2011 | 5.095.280 | 43.245.324 | 5.885.832 | 6 | 17 | |
2010 | 8.909.587 | 30.209.139 | 5.187.441 | 4 | 10 |
Total number of partners: 1096
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 202
Rare Partner: 894
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.23