
| 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 84 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 33 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 39 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 39 |
| Partner Constancy: | 29 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 39 |
| Diversity Index: | 28 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 64 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 39 |
| Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 50 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 300-400 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 65 |
| Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 200-300 |
| Total Project Funding: | 500-600 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 300-400 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
| Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 34 |
| Diversity Index: | 500-600 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 100-200 |
| Total Project Funding: | 500-600 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 100-200 |
| Partner Constancy: | 500-600 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 2 |
| Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 500-600 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 400-500 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 600-700 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Total funding / No of participants
Total number of projects: 147
As coordinator: 69
As participant: 76
Sole participant: 2
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.91*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2000 | 1.070.000 | 0 | 267.500 | 1 | ||
| 2002 | 0 | 3.314.642 | 278.664 | 2 | ||
| 2004 | 1.035.606 | 7.851.113 | 538.700 | 1 | 7 | |
| 2005 | 16.087.195 | 2.598.078 | 1.227.693 | 10 | 2 | |
| 2006 | 2.162.905 | 0 | 166.378 | 2 | ||
| 2007 | 571.500 | 0 | 57.150 | 1 | ||
| 2008 | 15.905.251 | 7.827.395 | 2.289.299 | 9 | 4 | |
| 2009 | 9.571.250 | 11.789.219 | 1.655.856 | 5 | 3 | |
| 2010 | 9.708.976 | 19.543.911 | 2.455.794 | 7 | 6 | |
| 2011 | 16.211.324 | 45.505.049 | 6.415.340 | 15 | 20 | |
| 2012 | 20.132.726 | 40.822.947 | 7.192.013 | 12 | 29 | |
| 2013 | 14.479.106 | 3.210.000 | 2.052.447 | 8 | 3 | |
Total number of partners:1347
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 443
Rare Partner: 904
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.49
| Category: | No: |
|---|---|
| INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 51 |
| RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 36 |
| SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 6 |
| ENERGY | 6 |
| BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 3 |
| MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 2 |