
| 2012 | |
|---|---|
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | > 1000 |
| Total Number of Projects: | > 1000 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2011 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 300-400 |
| Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 800-900 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 400-500 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 800-900 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 300-400 |
| Diversity Index: | 400-500 |
| 2010 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding: | 700-800 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 600-700 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 600-700 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2009 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 600-700 |
| Total Project Funding: | 700-800 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 900-1000 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 800-900 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 700-800 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | 300-400 |
| 2008 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding: | 400-500 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 300-400 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 200-300 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | 200-300 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
| Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
| 2007 | |
| Criterium: | Position: |
| Overall Score: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
| Total Project Funding per Partner: | 900-1000 |
| Total Number of Projects: | 900-1000 |
| Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
| Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
| Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
| Diversity Index: | 900-1000 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Total funding / No of participants
Total number of projects: 50
As coordinator: 5
As participant: 38
Sole participant: 7
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.13*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
| Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
| 2000 | 1.099.874 | 0 | 122.208 | 1 | ||
| 2004 | 0 | 963.000 | 192.600 | 1 | ||
| 2006 | 1.638.800 | 53.599.492 | 2.550.261 | 1 | 8 | |
| 2007 | 243.005 | 2.079.999 | 369.503 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2008 | 2.300.000 | 24.522.573 | 2.385.388 | 2 | 9 | |
| 2009 | 198.652 | 13.527.200 | 668.453 | 1 | 2 | |
| 2010 | 100.000 | 12.646.756 | 1.188.028 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2011 | 394.999 | 7.396.256 | 1.001.469 | 2 | 5 | |
| 2012 | 75.000 | 25.187.228 | 2.168.675 | 1 | 7 | |
| 2013 | 960.000 | 5.201.494 | 2.000.299 | 1 | 2 | |
Total number of partners:569
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 96
Rare Partner: 473
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.2
| Category: | No: |
|---|---|
| INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 30 |
| RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 15 |
| SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 5 |
| ENERGY | 4 |
| AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 2 |
| PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 1 |
| MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 1 |
| BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 1 |