2018 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 35 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 50 |
Total Number of Projects: | 34 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 39 |
2017 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 21 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 44 |
Total Number of Projects: | 29 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 8 |
2016 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 26 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 47 |
Total Number of Projects: | 35 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 16 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 27 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 34 |
Total Number of Projects: | 20 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 8 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 8 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 32 |
Total Number of Projects: | 17 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 2 |
Partner Constancy: | 16 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 38 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 19 |
Total Project Funding: | 17 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 41 |
Total Number of Projects: | 14 |
Partner Constancy: | 35 |
Project Leadership Index: | 41 |
Diversity Index: | 14 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 16 |
Total Project Funding: | 13 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 42 |
Total Number of Projects: | 18 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 8 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 8 |
Partner Constancy: | 26 |
Project Leadership Index: | 35 |
Diversity Index: | 12 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 11 |
Total Project Funding: | 8 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 33 |
Total Number of Projects: | 13 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 5 |
Partner Constancy: | 44 |
Project Leadership Index: | 200-300 |
Diversity Index: | 72 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 18 |
Total Project Funding: | 13 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 23 |
Total Number of Projects: | 20 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 11 |
Partner Constancy: | 62 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 19 |
Total Project Funding: | 19 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 41 |
Total Number of Projects: | 24 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 9 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 40 |
Total Project Funding: | 55 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 75 |
Total Number of Projects: | 49 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 23 |
Partner Constancy: | 200-300 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 200-300 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 31 |
Total Project Funding: | 45 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 42 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | 17 |
Partner Constancy: | 100-200 |
Project Leadership Index: | 100-200 |
Diversity Index: | 100-200 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Since 2014 individual funding per partner. If data is not available at CORDIS: total funding / No of participants.
Total number of projects: 1007
As coordinator: 156
As participant: 843
Sole participant: 8
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.19*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2019 | 34.077.840 | 278.684.137 | 17.461.712 | 7 | 31 | |
2018 | 24.381.741 | 311.936.400 | 20.245.918 | 3 | 35 | |
2017 | 41.604.625 | 346.487.635 | 22.946.927 | 6 | 43 | |
2016 | 29.291.965 | 282.351.515 | 23.555.079 | 4 | 43 | |
2015 | 29.965.949 | 281.758.152 | 24.941.469 | 7 | 48 | |
2014 | 20.637.276 | 213.346.345 | 18.727.983 | 6 | 34 | |
2013 | 62.701.625 | 332.336.913 | 28.992.486 | 14 | 64 | |
2012 | 77.440.554 | 180.890.644 | 28.022.782 | 19 | 46 | |
2011 | 32.717.381 | 326.626.704 | 31.733.552 | 10 | 71 | |
2010 | 29.171.726 | 264.920.294 | 31.805.503 | 9 | 50 | |
2009 | 19.484.197 | 172.765.727 | 11.049.710 | 7 | 38 | |
2008 | 32.883.471 | 121.004.702 | 11.384.053 | 8 | 33 | |
2007 | 11.355.585 | 35.636.812 | 2.441.415 | 2 | 11 | |
2006 | 23.575.405 | 115.257.938 | 7.809.211 | 10 | 30 | |
2005 | 9.292.712 | 144.406.521 | 6.304.677 | 7 | 30 | |
2004 | 24.934.988 | 207.020.616 | 8.724.491 | 5 | 33 | |
2003 | 2.191.565 | 58.808.254 | 4.814.280 | 4 | 28 | |
2002 | 21.134.042 | 92.960.463 | 10.527.820 | 13 | 62 | |
2001 | 16.918.411 | 93.476.962 | 12.153.138 | 12 | 65 | |
2000 | 14.969.049 | 75.218.555 | 10.027.873 | 11 | 48 |
Total number of partners:16001
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 7826
Rare Partner: 8175
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0.96
Category: | No: |
---|---|
INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 388 |
RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 361 |
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 307 |
PROTECTING MAN AND HIS ENVIRON | 264 |
ENERGY | 125 |
AGRICULTURE AND MARINE RESOURC | 63 |
PHYSICAL AND EXACT SCIENCES | 60 |
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 59 |
MEASUREMENTS AND STANDARDS | 38 |