2019 | |
---|---|
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 900-1000 |
Total Number of Projects: | > 1000 |
2018 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 900-1000 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | > 1000 |
Total Number of Projects: | 500-600 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
2015 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
2014 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
2013 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 300-400 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 66 |
Total Project Funding: | 700-800 |
Partner Constancy: | 58 |
Project Leadership Index: | 20 |
Diversity Index: | 49 |
2012 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 700-800 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
Total Number of Projects: | 68 |
Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | 46 |
Project Leadership Index: | 75 |
Diversity Index: | 41 |
2011 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 200-300 |
Total Number of Projects: | 500-600 |
Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | 900-1000 |
Project Leadership Index: | 900-1000 |
Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
2010 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 700-800 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | > 1000 |
Total Number of Projects: | > 1000 |
Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | 700-800 |
Project Leadership Index: | 800-900 |
Diversity Index: | 300-400 |
2009 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | 200-300 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 100-200 |
Total Number of Projects: | 400-500 |
Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | 900-1000 |
Project Leadership Index: | 24 |
Diversity Index: | 600-700 |
2008 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | 400-500 |
Total Number of Projects: | 600-700 |
Total Project Funding: | 700-800 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | > 1000 |
Project Leadership Index: | > 1000 |
Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
2007 | |
Criterium: | Position: |
Overall Score: | > 1000 |
Total Project Funding per Partner: | > 1000 |
Total Number of Projects: | 700-800 |
Total Project Funding: | > 1000 |
Networking Rank (Reputation): | > 1000 |
Partner Constancy: | 900-1000 |
Project Leadership Index: | 900-1000 |
Diversity Index: | > 1000 |
Total funding allocated to projects this organisation participated or coordinated
Since 2014 individual funding per partner. If data is not available at CORDIS: total funding / No of participants.
Total number of projects: 39
As coordinator: 5
As participant: 25
Sole participant: 9
Coordinator / Participant Ratio: 0.2*
*Ratio includes only projects with > 2 partners
Total project funding [€]: | Projects [No]: | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year: | coordinator* | participant* | per partner | as coordinator | as participant | |
2021 | 1.988.710 | 2.495.250 | 2.220.448 | 1 | 1 | |
2020 | 2.290.054 | 2.999.716 | 2.075.924 | 3 | 1 | |
2019 | 1.802.154 | 150.000 | 1.802.154 | 1 | 1 | |
2018 | 1.079.404 | 3.054.930 | 1.402.029 | 3 | 1 | |
2017 | 0 | 149.995 | 149.995 | 1 | ||
2016 | 195.455 | 1.996.830 | 2.192.285 | 1 | 1 | |
2015 | 0 | 2.330.004 | 600.265 | 1 | ||
2014 | 299.558 | 5.948.297 | 2.419.893 | 1 | 3 | |
2013 | 1.909.033 | 10.486.734 | 6.022.028 | 2 | 7 | |
2012 | 0 | 4.108.102 | 2.383.102 | 3 | ||
2011 | 210.093 | 10.124.512 | 4.622.860 | 1 | 5 | |
2010 | 6.499.982 | 0 | 961.384 | 1 |
Total number of partners:123
Partner loyalty:
Frequent Partner: (> 2 projects): 0
Rare Partner: 123
Frequent / Rare Partner Ratio: 0
Category: | No: |
---|---|
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONCERNS | 15 |
RTD HORIZONTAL TOPICS | 7 |
BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES | 2 |
INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY | 2 |
PROTECTING MAN AND HIS ENVIRON | 1 |